Dear All,
I produced a very preliminary agenda for our 3 sessions of the telecon
Collaboration Meeting AP Program:
https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=116…
The talk durations do not include the discussion time.
The program is not final yet, as you can see from the questionmarks, but
hopefully can be finalized in the next few days. Meanwhile please check
that all requested talks are included correctly. Please also let me know
whether the individual talk durations are currently over- or
underestimated, so that I can adjust them accordingly.
All the best,
and take care!
Anita
Dear All,
you will have received the message from Stefan Wagner that,
unfortunately, the HESS collaboration meeting in Obergurgl has to be
cancelled. Still, critical status updates are planned to be transported
to the whole collaboration, also supported via a dedicated vibe meeting.
Further forms of exchanging information are possible. E.g., each
department may organize also a department-wide vibe meeting with talks,
reports, etc that would be beneficial to communicate to beyond the WG.
For the Astrophysics Department it is upon us:
- if
- what
- in which form and format
- when
Please comment by tomorrow (Thursday) late afternoon (~5pm). We may also
have a quick vibe meeting on this (Friday?) if you think it is helpful.
I am truly sorry for this turn. A lot of work and time has flown already
into the preparations of an attractive AP Program for a
F2F(!)-collaboration meeting. Vibe meetings can not substitute the
important discussions that are typically triggered in F2F-meetings.
Still, to demonstrate an active astrophysics program within HESS,
motivation for most to dedicate a lot of time and engagement to the HESS
experiment, is important.
All the best,
Anita
Dear All,
you may recall that at the F2F-meeting last week we discussed that
*session 1* of the AP program at the collaboration meeting shall provide
an overview of what we think is do-able & important for HESS to push.
Emma's sketch (below) nicely captures this idea I think. Each AWG has
science priorities that are planned for the next upcoming years of HESS
operations, which should be transported in this talk in a convincing way
using sensible arguments. In order to not having a several hours long
talk I suggest that each group restricts itself to the highest
priority/hottest topic the respective group is aiming for. My rough
outline/sketch of such talk is attached. I would estimate ~3 (-4??)
slides per [AWG] that touch upon the questions indicated in the outline.
As said at the F2F I am available to present this talk (provided help by
you wrt slides etc) if you all wish so.
Please feel free to comment (incl. outline) by next Monday at the
latest, please.
It would be good to receive all slides by ~Thursday next week at the
very latest, so that any further changes can be done without too much
pressure.
Concerning the *preparations for the AP program* at the collaboration
meeting I got the impression that more communication and information
exchange is needed. I therefore would like to offer to have a quick vibe
meeting tomorrow (Friday 5 March) afternoon, or Monday at the latest,
where we should clarify upon the structure we want for this AP program
and answer all open questions. (The current build-up of this meeting at
https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103…
looks partly at bit confusing to me at the moment wrt what we agreed
upon at the F2F.) If you're interested in such quick (<30min)
vibe-meeting please indicate your availability at:
https://framadate.uibk.ac.at/studs.php?sondage=zu3y7s8gtqqh68gp
by tomorrow lunch time at the latest.
All the best,
Anita
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Session 1
Datum: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:17:36 +0100
Von: Emma de Ona Wilhelmi <wilhelmi(a)ice.csic.es>
An: Anita Reimer <Anita.Reimer(a)uibk.ac.at>
*(20 min + 20 discussion?)*
*1/ Session on Future with HESS – Priorities on the Science Topics *
·*Hot topics on each WG - Science Priorities (slides from conveners)*
·*HESS vs CTA *
·*HESS role on the context of HAWC, LHAASO, ARGO … *
**
*How to trigger the discussion? Maybe discuss each of these points? We
(conveners) could start commenting on something, so people feel
encourage to talk.*
*
*
*Shall we focus the discussion on times and days? … :-) *
Dear *s,
as I announced yesterday during our call, we need to prepare a couple of slides in which we explain our view on the priorities of the stellar physics WG for the upcoming years. I prepared the attached ones, based on our activities, and also some projects which have been initiated in the last months. Anita asked to send them by Monday, so please send me comments before Monday evening (sorry for the short time and over the weekend).
We also need to think about the Special sessions in Obergurgl. During the call yesterday I suggested a couple of topics that might be good to discuss, if enough people are available and willing to meet:
https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/display/HESS/March+2020+Call+of+… <https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/display/HESS/March+2020+Call+of+…>
https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/display/HESS/March+2020+Call+of+… <https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/display/HESS/March+2020+Call+of+…>
•Unidentified PeVatrons
•Binaries above 10 TeV –Project kick-off meeting
•Compact binary systems –Including LMXB, Globular Clusters, Mspulsars
•HESS J0632+057 –X-checks and analysis
•PSR: Vela (most probably difficult since relevant WG people won’t be attending)
•Any other ideas?
Please comment on the above and/or suggest any other topic that you think it is important to discuss.
Have a good weekend
Emma
Dear All,
any aspect you think would be good (in view of our collaboration
meeting's AP program) to have added here (see below the message from the
IT/Computing department)?
Best,
Anita
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: [Hess-ec] IT Presentations at Obergurgl
Datum: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:05:15 +0100
Von: Mathieu de Naurois <denauroi(a)in2p3.fr>
An: hess-it(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de
Kopie (CC): hess-ec(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de
Dear colleagues,
For the upcoming collaboration meeting, I discussed with S. Wagner and
we would propose as a starting point the following program
that could fit in ~ 3 hours. Let me know your comments / suggestions /
proposition for eventual other talks asap, as well as possible names.
Thanks in advance,
Mathieu
========================
- Calibration:
-- One general talk covering both PA and HAP calibration chains, NamCam
calibration and prospects towards merging of the calibration chains,
Vincent Marandon, ~ 20 min
- Simulation:
-- Smash status, Jean Philippe Lenain, 15 min
-- HAP MC production status, if needed and not covered in the HAP talk
(t.b.d) 15 min
- HAP:
-- General status, Lars Mohrmann, ~ 20 min
- PA:
-- General status, Markus Holler, ~ 20 min
-- How to produce & use RWS IRFS (t.b.d), 15 min
- Open Source:
-- Status (exporters, tools, etc), Régis Terrier, ~ 20 min
-- Example of use?
- Analysis Forum:
-- Overall presentation, François Brun, ~20 min
-- Typical analysis problems, pitfals, ... t.b.d, ~20 min
- Archive:
-- Plans & prospects, Catherine Boisson, 10 min
- Communication:
-- Tools & prospects, Heike Prokoph, 10 min
--
Hess-ec mailing list
Hess-ec(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de
https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ec
Dear AP conveners,
following the proposal evaluation by the OC during the OC meeting last
week in Heidelberg, preparation of the LTS is ongoing. Only then final
results (i.e. if a program will be scheduled and with what priority)
will be known. At the same time, we are preparing responses to the
respective proposal PIs.
It was mentioned on several occasions, but may not have reached all of
you: AP conveners had been invited to the OC evaluation for very good
reasons, but the OC meeting as such is considered confidential. Feedback
to the proposers should only come through the feedback by the OC. This
is to avoid the danger of non-coherent feedback, and also to avoid
serving proposers on different timescales.
Best, Gerd
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Puehlhofer Gerd.Puehlhofer(a)astro.uni-tuebingen.de
IAAT, Sand 1, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
Tel.: +49-7071-29-74982 Fax: +49-7071-29-3458
---------------------------------------------------------
Dear Anita, All,
Just a quick update on the situation with Jets.
Laura is on board for SS433. I am waiting to hear back from Michael Zacharias about a general AGN monitoring/flares talk. (Alicja is not attending but I have asked them to coordinate).
Dorit will not be there, so I am thinking about a replacement for M87, but will update you on that tomorrow. For the time being, I expect to ask for 3*20mins. It would be useful to have 20 min talk plus some discussion time, but that could be negotiated once we see the other inputs presented to the EC.
All the best
Garret
On 03/03/2020, 21:58, "Hess-ap on behalf of Horns, Dieter" <hess-ap-bounces(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de on behalf of dieter.horns(a)desy.de> wrote:
Hi Anita - sorry for the late response. There is a contribution wrt LIV by Christelle Levy (20 Min), the IGS is clear (Moulin). THomas Tavernier will report on PBH (20 Minutes). And finally, we will discuss tomorrow about whether we will have another contribution on the WLM dwarf irregular. So far, this has not been discussed.
Best wishes,
Dieter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anita Reimer" <anita.reimer(a)uibk.ac.at>
To: "Dieter Horns" <dieter.horns(a)desy.de>
Cc: "Emma de Ona Wilhelmi" <wilhelmi(a)ice.csic.es>, "Hess-ap" <hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Monday, 2 March, 2020 08:34:35
Subject: Re: [Hess-ap] Agenda: Mail to the WGs
Hi Dieter,
to have the final schedule by Wednesday afternoon is perfectly fine. If
I could get a rough estimate of the total time (no exact breakdown nor
titles nor corresponding speakers must be known at this stage) by
Tuesday evening though, would be very helpful for me to give the EC at
the Wednesday morning meeting a rough estimate of the total time the
Astrophysics Department would need at the collaboration meeting. Would
this be possible?
All the best,
Anita
On 01/03/2020 19:35, Horns, Dieter wrote:
> Hi Anita- we are having a short call in the PBSM working group on
> Wednesday to finalize the program. We have already a table with the
> talks collected on the PBSM confluence page. I hope it will be ok to
> have the final schedule ready by Wednesday afternoon,
> best wishes,
> Dieter
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"Anita Reimer" <anita.reimer(a)uibk.ac.at>
> *To: *"Emma de Ona Wilhelmi" <wilhelmi(a)ice.csic.es>
> *Cc: *"Hess-ap" <hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de>
> *Sent: *Friday, 28 February, 2020 17:03:19
> *Subject: *Re: [Hess-ap] Agenda: Mail to the WGs
>
> Dear Emma, All,
>
> first I'd like to thank you all for all your contributions to the (I
> think) a fruitful F2F-meeting with lively discussions that we had last
> Tuesday/Wednesday in Heidelberg.
>
> Thanks so much, Emma, for drafting this email below. While I think it is
> important to transport our envisioned structure for the AP program of
> the collaboration meeting to all WGs so that everybody sees the flow of
> topics, it might be difficult to coordinate it the way you propose as
> some of the WGs have (wisely) already started with collecting the talks
> that shall be presented at the collaboration meeting. However, I might
> be wrong. Please (all) comment.
> Nevertheless I have edited (below) a bit your draft email on the AP
> program at the upcoming collaboration meeting to all WGs. Please change
> where you find appropriate.
>
> Meanwhile I have created a confluence page for the preparation of the AP
> program at the collaboration meeting:
> https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103…
>
> Please fill in the talks as soon as possible. More urgent is to get a
> time estimate for each topic, and for the total AP program (until
> Tuesday evening if possible), so that it can be communicated to the EC
> as soon as possible.
>
> All the best,
> Anita
>
> ===============================================================================================
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this week,
> where we discussed several issues, amongst others on how to make an
> efficient and engaging AP program for the upcoming collaboration
> meeting. We would like to change a bit the previous structure which
> typically had many contributions for (sometimes not very incremental)
> status reports. Rather than that, we propose to ask the different
> Task/Project groups to collectively prepare a general talk and choose a
> speaker that would give a scientific context and a summary of the
> results. We encourage you too to include also the MWL needs in each of
> the presentations.
> We understand it is also important to have detailed discussions on
> particular aspects of the project or analysis, therefore we also propose
> to use some of the Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get together and
> discuss some of these particular projects.
>
> As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following
> contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that *could*
> be included, if you would like to share the status of the project on the
> Col. Mtg..
>
> *a/ Session on Galactic Center / CR diffusion *
>
> * We envision 3 contributions including: *
>
> o*Astrophysics *
>
> o*Dark Matter *
>
> o*Diffuse *
>
> *For****"Astrophysics"
> *
>
> *- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..*
>
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Variability of the GC*
>
> We would like to encourage those working on the Astrophysics aspects of
> the GC region to organize such talk.
>
> Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
> information on the expectation from this talk.
>
> *For "Dark Matter"
> *
> *
> *
> Please add Dieter in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
> on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
> *For "Diffuse"
> *
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: LMC/SMC. *
> *- Topics under the CR propagation WG: *
> *
> *
> Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
> information on the expectation from this talk. **
> *
> *
> *b/ Session on non-compact CRs Accelerators: *
>
> o*SNR evolution *
>
> o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons *
>
> o*Leptonic PeVatrons *
>
> *For **"SNR evolution (young / old SNRs )"*
>
> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
>
> ***For **"Unidentified / PeVatrons"
> *
>
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar Clusters*
> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
> *
> *
> Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
> information on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
> *
> *
> *For "Leptonic PeVatrons"
> *
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary*
> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
>
> Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
> information on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
> *
> *
>
> *c/ **Compact Objects*
>
> o*Pulsars*
>
> o*Microquasars *
>
> o*Jets M87*
>
> o*Jets monitoring / flares*
>
> *For "Pulsars"*
>
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706*
>
> Please add Emma in the loop, she can give you more detailed information
> on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
>
> *For "Microquasars"*
>
> *- Topics under the Jets: SS433*
>
> Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
> information on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
>
> *For "Jets-M87"*
>
> *- Topics under the Jets:
> *
>
> Please add Garret in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
> on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
>
> *For "Jets monitoring/flares"*
>
> *- Topics under the Jets: *
>
> Please add Garret in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
> on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
> **
> *
> *
> *d/ Pair-halo, EBL*
>
> *e/ GW Follow-up*
>
>
> Please add Fabian in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
> on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
> *
> *
> *f/ Fast variability:*
>
> o*FRBs *
>
> o*Primordial Black Holes
> *
>
>
> **For "FRBs"**
>
> Please add Fabian in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
> on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
> *
> *
>
> ***For "Primordial Black Holes"***
> **
> Please add Dieter in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
> on the expectation from this talk. *
> *
> *
> *
> **
> **
>
> oAnyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another contributed
> talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be discussed. Please
> discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as possible.
>
> The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the WG
> mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG coordinator to
> suggest any relevant topic.
>
>
>
>
> Am 27.02.20 um 15:54 schrieb Emma de Ona Wilhelmi:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I was drafting an email to the Stellar WG, but I realised that we
> need a lot of coordination between different groups, if we want to
> have the talks we proposed in the Agenda. I wonder then if it is
> better to write a common email that we can all draft together, to
> organise the contributions?
>
> I came out with the following email. Please feel free to modify and
> critisize, it is just a first draft and I didn’t even read it twice…
>
> Cheers
> e
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this
> week, where we discussed several issues, including the new
> publication policy and structure for the collaboration meeting.
>
> Regarding the first point, publication policy, the previous
> procedure has been modified to try to make the process of paper
> publishing more efficient. The new structure can be found
> here:*(LINK TO CONFLUENCE)*
> The basic steps are the following:
>
> New Idea -> Present it on the WG (and approved) -> Work/DATA &
> presentation of (semi)final results -> Draft and circulation among
> WG -> Paper Review by internal referees -> Collaboration Review ->
> Paper submission
>
> We also had a long discussion on how to make an efficient and
> engaging AP program during the collaboration meeting. We would like
> to somehow change a bit the previous structure with many
> contributions for (sometimes not very incremental) status report.
> Rather than that, we propose to ask the different Task/Project
> groups to collectively prepare a general talk and choose a speaker
> that would give a scientific context and a summary of the results.
> We understand it is also important to have detailed discussions on
> particular aspects of the analysis or project, therefore we also
> propose to use some of the Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get
> together and discuss some of these particular projects.
>
> As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following
> contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that
> *could* be included, if you would like to share the status of the
> project on the Col. Mtg.. We encourage you too to include also the
> MWL needs in each of the presentations.
>
> *1/ Session on Galactic Center / CR diffusion *
>
> * We envision 3 contributions including: *
>
> o*Astrophysics *
>
> o*Dark Matter *
>
> o*Diffuse *
>
> *Astrophysics *
>
> *- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..*
>
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Variability of the GC*
>
> *We would like to encourage people working on the Astrophysics
> aspects of the GC region to organise such talk. *
>
> *Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more
> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
>
> *Dark Matter *
> *
> *
> *Diffuse *
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: LMC/SMC. *
> *- Topics under the CR propagation WG: *
> *
> *
> *Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more
> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *2/ Session on CRs Accelerators: *
>
> o*SNR evolution *
>
> o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons *
>
> o*Leptonic PeVatrons *
>
> *SNR evolution: (young / old SNRs )*
>
> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
>
> ***Unidentified / PeVatrons *
>
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar
> Clusters*
> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
> *
> *
> *Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more
> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
> *
> *
> *Leptonic PeVatrons *
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary*
> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
> *Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more
> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
>
>
> *3/ **Compact Objects*
>
> o*Pulsars*
>
> o*Microquasars *
>
> o*Jets M87*
>
> o*Jets monitoring / flares*
>
> *Pulsars*
>
> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706*
>
> *Microquasars*
>
> *- Topics under the Jets: SS433*
> *
> *
> *Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more
> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
>
> *Jets M87*
>
> *- Topics under the Jets: *
>
> *Jets monitoring/flares*
>
> *- Topics under the Jets: *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *4/ Pair-halo EBL*
>
> *5/GW Follow-up*
> *
> *
> *6/ Fast variability:*
>
> o*FRBs *
>
> o*Fast variability related to DM – Primordial Black Holes (?)*
>
> *7/ DM Clumps (?)***
>
>
> Anyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another
> contributed talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be
> discussed. Please discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as
> possible.
>
>
>
> The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the WG
> mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG
> coordinator to suggest any relevant topic.
>
>
> **
>
>
>
> --
> Hess-ap mailing list
> Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de
> https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap
--
Hess-ap mailing list
Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de
https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap
Dear All,
the minutes (thanks to Emma & Carlo for helping here!) & other
material sent around during the F2F-meeting are now all on confluence:
https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/display/HESS/Meetings+of+the+Ast…
Reminder AP program at collaboration meeting:
As a rough estimate for tomorrow's EC-meeting I will assume an average
talk duration of ~30min (incl. discussion) per topic unless communicated
to me otherwise.
Best wishes,
Anita
