28 Feb
2020
28 Feb
'20
4:03 p.m.
Dear Emma, All,
first I'd like to thank you all for all your contributions to the (I
think) a fruitful F2F-meeting with lively discussions that we had last
Tuesday/Wednesday in Heidelberg.
Thanks so much, Emma, for drafting this email below. While I think it is
important to transport our envisioned structure for the AP program of
the collaboration meeting to all WGs so that everybody sees the flow of
topics, it might be difficult to coordinate it the way you propose as
some of the WGs have (wisely) already started with collecting the talks
that shall be presented at the collaboration meeting. However, I might
be wrong. Please (all) comment.
Nevertheless I have edited (below) a bit your draft email on the AP
program at the upcoming collaboration meeting to all WGs. Please change
where you find appropriate.
Meanwhile I have created a confluence page for the preparation of the AP
program at the collaboration meeting:
https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103…
Please fill in the talks as soon as possible. More urgent is to get a
time estimate for each topic, and for the total AP program (until
Tuesday evening if possible), so that it can be communicated to the EC
as soon as possible.
All the best,
Anita
===============================================================================================
Dear colleagues,
we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this week,
where we discussed several issues, amongst others on how to make an
efficient and engaging AP program for the upcoming collaboration
meeting. We would like to change a bit the previous structure which
typically had many contributions for (sometimes not very incremental)
status reports. Rather than that, we propose to ask the different
Task/Project groups to collectively prepare a general talk and choose a
speaker that would give a scientific context and a summary of the
results. We encourage you too to include also the MWL needs in each of
the presentations.
We understand it is also important to have detailed discussions on
particular aspects of the project or analysis, therefore we also propose
to use some of the Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get together and
discuss some of these particular projects.
As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following
contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that *could*
be included, if you would like to share the status of the project on the
Col. Mtg..
*a/ Session on Galactic Center / CR diffusion *
* We envision 3 contributions including: *
o*Astrophysics *
o*Dark Matter *
o*Diffuse *
*For****"Astrophysics"
*
*- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..*
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: Variability of the GC*
We would like to encourage those working on the Astrophysics aspects of
the GC region to organize such talk.
Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
information on the expectation from this talk.
*For "Dark Matter"
*
*
*
Please add Dieter in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*For "Diffuse"
*
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: LMC/SMC. *
*- Topics under the CR propagation WG: *
*
*
Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
information on the expectation from this talk. **
*
*
*b/ Session on non-compact CRs Accelerators: *
o*SNR evolution *
o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons *
o*Leptonic PeVatrons *
*For **"SNR evolution (young / old SNRs )"*
*- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
***For **"Unidentified / PeVatrons"
*
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar Clusters*
*- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
*
*
Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
information on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*
*
*For "Leptonic PeVatrons"
*
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary*
*- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
information on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*
*
*c/ **Compact Objects*
o*Pulsars*
o*Microquasars *
o*Jets M87*
o*Jets monitoring / flares*
*For "Pulsars"*
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706*
Please add Emma in the loop, she can give you more detailed information
on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*For "Microquasars"*
*- Topics under the Jets: SS433*
Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
information on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*For "Jets-M87"*
*- Topics under the Jets:
*
Please add Garret in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*For "Jets monitoring/flares"*
*- Topics under the Jets: *
Please add Garret in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
on the expectation from this talk. *
*
**
*
*
*d/ Pair-halo, EBL*
*e/ GW Follow-up*
Please add Fabian in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*
*
*f/ Fast variability:*
o*FRBs *
o*Primordial Black Holes
*
**For "FRBs"**
Please add Fabian in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*
*
***For "Primordial Black Holes"***
**
Please add Dieter in the loop, he can give you more detailed information
on the expectation from this talk. *
*
*
*
**
**
oAnyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another contributed
talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be discussed. Please
discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as possible.
The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the WG
mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG coordinator to
suggest any relevant topic.
Am 27.02.20 um 15:54 schrieb Emma de Ona Wilhelmi:
Dear all,
I was drafting an email to the Stellar WG, but I realised that we need
a lot of coordination between different groups, if we want to have the
talks we proposed in the Agenda. I wonder then if it is better to
write a common email that we can all draft together, to organise the
contributions?
I came out with the following email. Please feel free to modify and
critisize, it is just a first draft and I didn’t even read it twice…
Cheers
e
Dear colleagues,
we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this
week, where we discussed several issues, including the new publication
policy and structure for the collaboration meeting.
Regarding the first point, publication policy, the previous procedure
has been modified to try to make the process of paper publishing more
efficient. The new structure can be found here:*(LINK TO CONFLUENCE)*
The basic steps are the following:
New Idea -> Present it on the WG (and approved) -> Work/DATA &
presentation of (semi)final results -> Draft and circulation among WG
-> Paper Review by internal referees -> Collaboration Review -> Paper
submission
We also had a long discussion on how to make an efficient and engaging
AP program during the collaboration meeting. We would like to somehow
change a bit the previous structure with many contributions for
(sometimes not very incremental) status report. Rather than that, we
propose to ask the different Task/Project groups to collectively
prepare a general talk and choose a speaker that would give a
scientific context and a summary of the results. We understand it is
also important to have detailed discussions on particular aspects of
the analysis or project, therefore we also propose to use some of the
Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get together and discuss some of
these particular projects.
As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following
contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that
*could* be included, if you would like to share the status of the
project on the Col. Mtg.. We encourage you too to include also the MWL
needs in each of the presentations.
*1/ Session on Galactic Center / CR diffusion *
* We envision 3 contributions including: *
o*Astrophysics *
o*Dark Matter *
o*Diffuse *
*Astrophysics *
*- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..*
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: Variability of the GC*
*We would like to encourage people working on the Astrophysics aspects
of the GC region to organise such talk. *
*Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more
detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
*Dark Matter *
*
*
*Diffuse *
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: LMC/SMC. *
*- Topics under the CR propagation WG: *
*
*
*Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more
detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
*
*
*
*
*2/ Session on CRs Accelerators: *
o*SNR evolution *
o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons *
o*Leptonic PeVatrons *
*SNR evolution: (young / old SNRs )*
*- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
***Unidentified / PeVatrons *
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar Clusters*
*- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
*
*
*Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
*
*
*Leptonic PeVatrons *
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary*
*- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: *
*Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
*3/ **Compact Objects*
o*Pulsars*
o*Microquasars *
o*Jets M87*
o*Jets monitoring / flares*
*Pulsars*
*- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706*
*Microquasars*
*- Topics under the Jets: SS433*
*
*
*Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed
instructions of what we expect from this talk. *
*Jets M87*
*- Topics under the Jets: *
*Jets monitoring/flares*
*- Topics under the Jets: *
*
*
*
*
*4/ Pair-halo EBL*
*5/GW Follow-up*
*
*
*6/ Fast variability:*
o*FRBs *
o*Fast variability related to DM – Primordial Black Holes (?)*
*7/ DM Clumps (?)***
Anyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another contributed
talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be discussed.
Please discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as possible.
The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the WG
mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG coordinator
to suggest any relevant topic.
**