On 25 Feb 2020, at 17:08, Emma de Ona Wilhelmi <wilhelmi(a)ice.csic.es> wrote: Updated version. To be discussed on the context of the Agenda: 1/ Session on Future with HESS – Priorities on the Science Topics 2/ Session on Selected Projects · Galactic Center / CR diffusion: o Astrophysics (could include variability) o Dark Matter o Diffuse (could include LMC / SMC) · PeVatrons o SNR evolution (could include Kepler/SN1987a) o Unidentified (could include Wd1 / J1908) o Leptonic PeVatrons (could include Binary / PWNe / Geminga) · Compact Objects o Pulsars (could include Vela/PSRJ1706/Crab + LIV) o Microquasars – SS 433 o Jets M87 o Jets monitoring / flares · Pair-halo EBL · GW Follow-up · Fast variability: o FRBs o Fast variability related to DM – Primordial Black Holes (?) · DM Clumps (?) · MWL coverage (?) 3/ Special Sessions on Individual Projects (and report on the general meeting?) -- Hess-ap mailing list Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap

On 3 Mar 2020, at 10:32, Jacco Vink &lt;j.vink(a)uva.nl&gt; wrote: Hi All, I am catching up with my emails now. Some comment on the SNR topics: I would like to include N132D. Maria Haupt emailed me she is not attending. She is currently leading the SN1987A and LMC efforts (I think sources not the diffuse part, but I need to check). But she told me she can provide some slides. Jacco > On 25 Feb 2020, at 17:08, Emma de Ona Wilhelmi &lt;wilhelmi(a)ice.csic.es <mailto:wilhelmi@ice.csic.es>> wrote: > > Updated version. To be discussed on the context of the Agenda: > > 1/ Session on Future with HESS – Priorities on the Science Topics > > > > 2/ Session on Selected Projects > > > > · Galactic Center / CR diffusion: > > o Astrophysics (could include variability) > > o Dark Matter > > o Diffuse (could include LMC / SMC) > > > > · PeVatrons > > o SNR evolution (could include Kepler/SN1987a) > > o Unidentified (could include Wd1 / J1908) > > o Leptonic PeVatrons (could include Binary / PWNe / Geminga) > > · Compact Objects > > o Pulsars (could include Vela/PSRJ1706/Crab + LIV) > > o Microquasars – SS 433 > > o Jets M87 > > o Jets monitoring / flares > > · Pair-halo EBL > > · GW Follow-up > > · Fast variability: > > o FRBs > > o Fast variability related to DM – Primordial Black Holes (?) > > · DM Clumps (?) > > · MWL coverage (?) > > > > 3/ Special Sessions on Individual Projects (and report on the general meeting?) > > > > > >> On 25 Feb 2020, at 16:58, Emma de Ona Wilhelmi &lt;wilhelmi(a)ice.csic.es <mailto:wilhelmi@ice.csic.es>> wrote: >> >> Session on Future with HESS – Priorities on the Science >> >> >> >> Session on Selected Topics >> >> >> >> · Galactic Center: >> >> o Astrophysics (could include variability) >> >> o Diffuse (could include LMC / SMC) >> >> o Dark Matter >> >> >> >> · PeVatrons >> >> o SNR evolution (could include Kepler/SN1987a) >> >> o Unidentified (could include Wd1 / J1908) >> >> o Leptonic PeVatrons (could include Binary / PWNe / Geminga) >> >> · Compact Objects >> >> o Pulsars (could include Vela/PSRJ1706/Crab + LIV) >> >> o Microquasars – SS 433 >> >> o Jets M87 >> >> o Jets monitoring / flares >> >> · Pair-halo EBL >> >> · GW Follow-up >> >> · Fast variability: >> >> o FRBs >> >> o Fast variability related to DM – Primordial Black Holes (?) >> >> · DM Clumps (?) >> >> · MWL coverage (?) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 25 Feb 2020, at 14:47, Anita Reimer &lt;anita.reimer(a)uibk.ac.at <mailto:anita.reimer@uibk.ac.at>> wrote: >>> >>> <AgendaCollMeetingObergurgl.docx>-- >>> Hess-ap mailing list >>> Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de <mailto:Hess-ap@lsw.uni-heidelberg.de> >>> https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap <https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsrv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fhess-ap&data=02%7C01%7Cj.vink%40uva.nl%7C99e4d03aa60c4baa9be608d7ba0cea10%7Ca0f1cacd618c4403b94576fb3d6874e5%7C1%7C0%7C637182437007580991&sdata=8ucmFma%2FqQeDWqzRQ406x%2BKxpE1hRibh6xxClBqueKA%3D&reserved=0> >> >> -- >> Hess-ap mailing list >> Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de <mailto:Hess-ap@lsw.uni-heidelberg.de> >> https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap <https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap> > > -- > Hess-ap mailing list > Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de <mailto:Hess-ap@lsw.uni-heidelberg.de> > https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsrv1n.lsw… <https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsrv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fhess-ap&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cj.vink%40uva.nl%7C99e4d03aa60c4baa9be608d7ba0cea10%7Ca0f1cacd618c4403b94576fb3d6874e5%7C1%7C0%7C637182437007600908&amp;sdata=SyXcfJZnf2q8%2BZQlAKU6OheZI3yjZv6nHyXA6aWofD0%3D&amp;reserved=0>

Dear all, I was drafting an email to the Stellar WG, but I realised that we need a lot of coordination between different groups, if we want to have the talks we proposed in the Agenda. I wonder then if it is better to write a common email that we can all draft together, to organise the contributions? I came out with the following email. Please feel free to modify and critisize, it is just a first draft and I didn’t even read it twice… Cheers e Dear colleagues, we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this week, where we discussed several issues, including the new publication policy and structure for the collaboration meeting. Regarding the first point, publication policy, the previous procedure has been modified to try to make the process of paper publishing more efficient. The new structure can be found here:*(LINK TO CONFLUENCE)* The basic steps are the following: New Idea -> Present it on the WG (and approved) -> Work/DATA & presentation of (semi)final results -> Draft and circulation among WG -> Paper Review by internal referees -> Collaboration Review -> Paper submission We also had a long discussion on how to make an efficient and engaging AP program during the collaboration meeting. We would like to somehow change a bit the previous structure with many contributions for (sometimes not very incremental) status report. Rather than that, we propose to ask the different Task/Project groups to collectively prepare a general talk and choose a speaker that would give a scientific context and a summary of the results. We understand it is also important to have detailed discussions on particular aspects of the analysis or project, therefore we also propose to use some of the Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get together and discuss some of these particular projects. As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that *could* be included, if you would like to share the status of the project on the Col. Mtg.. We encourage you too to include also the MWL needs in each of the presentations. *1/ Session on Galactic Center  / CR diffusion * *   We envision 3 contributions including: * o*Astrophysics * o*Dark Matter * o*Diffuse * *Astrophysics * *- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..* *- Topics under the Stellar WG:  Variability of the GC* *We would like to encourage people working on the Astrophysics aspects of the GC region to organise such talk. * *Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * *Dark Matter * * * *Diffuse * *- Topics under the Stellar WG:  LMC/SMC. * *- Topics under the CR propagation WG: * * * *Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * * * * * *2/ Session on CRs Accelerators: * o*SNR evolution * o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons * o*Leptonic PeVatrons * *SNR evolution: (young / old SNRs )* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * ***Unidentified / PeVatrons * *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar Clusters* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * * * *Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * * * *Leptonic PeVatrons * *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * *Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * *3/ **Compact Objects* o*Pulsars* o*Microquasars * o*Jets M87* o*Jets monitoring / flares* *Pulsars* *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706* *Microquasars* *- Topics under the Jets: SS433* * * *Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * *Jets M87* *- Topics under the Jets: * *Jets monitoring/flares* *- Topics under the Jets: * * * * * *4/ Pair-halo EBL* *5/GW Follow-up* * * *6/ Fast variability:* o*FRBs * o*Fast variability related to DM – Primordial Black Holes (?)* *7/ DM Clumps (?)*** Anyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another contributed talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be discussed. Please discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as possible. The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the WG mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG coordinator to suggest any relevant topic. **

yes, indeed. This is my understanding, too. I counted 15 topics in total. Depending on how long the talk per topic approximately will be, one could schedule typically 1 talk per topic, in very few special cases 2 talks (not more, please) per topic. At the moment, something like 8,5-9hrs in total for this "Session 2" are foreseen. It would be good to know by Tuesday evening if our required total time for this Session 2 is significantly more or less than these ~9hours, so that I can inquire accordingly at the Wednesday EC-meeting whether some shifts in the collaboration meeting schedule are possible. I presume that Dieter is just finalizing the PBSM-contribution to the AP-program at the collaboration meeting.

All the best, Anita On 01/03/2020 20:55, SCHUSSLER Fabian wrote: > Hi all, > I would like to better understand the procedure. I had thought that we concluded during the F2F meeting to define the most important topics to be discussed during the Obergurgl meeting (represented by the list put together by Emma) and then ask the different WGs and task forces to propose speakers for these talks. Is this correct? Or, as I understand Dieter, is there still time for contributed talks proposed by members of the different WGs? > Cheers, > Fabian > --------------------------------------------- > Fabian Schüssler > CEA Irfu DPhP > Bât. 141, 153b > 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France > Tel.: +33 1 69 08 30 20 > http://irfu.cea.fr/Pisp/fabian.schussler >> Le 1 mars 2020 à 19:35, Horns, Dieter &lt;dieter.horns(a)desy.de <mailto:dieter.horns@desy.de>> a écrit : >> >> Hi Anita- we are having a short call in the PBSM working group on Wednesday to finalize the program. We have already a table with the talks collected on the PBSM confluence page. I hope it will be ok to have the final schedule ready by Wednesday afternoon, >> best wishes, >> Dieter >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Anita Reimer" &lt;anita.reimer(a)uibk.ac.at <mailto:anita.reimer@uibk.ac.at>> >> *To: *"Emma de Ona Wilhelmi" &lt;wilhelmi(a)ice.csic.es <mailto:wilhelmi@ice.csic.es>> >> *Cc: *"Hess-ap" &lt;hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de <mailto:hess-ap@lsw.uni-heidelberg.de>> >> *Sent: *Friday, 28 February, 2020 17:03:19 >> *Subject: *Re: [Hess-ap] Agenda: Mail to the WGs >> >> Dear Emma, All, >> >> first I'd like to thank you all for all your contributions to the (I think) a fruitful F2F-meeting with lively discussions that we had last Tuesday/Wednesday in Heidelberg. >> >> Thanks so much, Emma, for drafting this email below. While I think it is important to transport our envisioned structure for the AP program of the collaboration meeting to all WGs so that everybody sees the flow of topics, it might be difficult to coordinate it the way you propose as some of the WGs have (wisely) already started with collecting the talks that shall be presented at the collaboration meeting. However, I might be wrong. Please (all) comment. >> Nevertheless I have edited (below) a bit your draft email on the AP program at the upcoming collaboration meeting to all WGs. Please change where you find appropriate. >> >> Meanwhile I have created a confluence page for the preparation of the AP program at the collaboration meeting: >> https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103… >> >> Please fill in the talks as soon as possible. More urgent is to get a time estimate for each topic, and for the total AP program (until Tuesday evening if possible), so that it can be communicated to the EC as soon as possible. >> >> All the best, >> Anita >> >> =============================================================================================== >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this week, where we discussed several issues, amongst others on how to make an efficient and engaging AP program for the upcoming collaboration meeting. We would like to change a bit the previous structure which typically had many contributions for (sometimes not very incremental) status reports. Rather than that, we propose to ask the different Task/Project groups to collectively prepare a general talk and choose a speaker that would give a scientific context and a summary of the results. We encourage you too to include also the MWL needs in each of the presentations. >> We understand it is also important to have detailed discussions on particular aspects of the project or analysis, therefore we also propose to use some of the Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get together and discuss some of these particular projects. >> >> As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that *could* be included, if you would like to share the status of the project on the Col. Mtg.. >> >> *a/ Session on Galactic Center / CR diffusion * >> >> * We envision 3 contributions including: * >> >> o*Astrophysics * >> >> o*Dark Matter * >> >> o*Diffuse * >> >> *For****"Astrophysics" >> * >> >> *- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..* >> >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Variability of the GC* >> >> We would like to encourage those working on the Astrophysics aspects of the GC region to organize such talk. >> >> Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. >> >> *For "Dark Matter" >> * >> * >> * >> Please add Dieter in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> *For "Diffuse" >> * >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: LMC/SMC. * >> *- Topics under the CR propagation WG: * >> * >> * >> Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. ** >> * >> * >> *b/ Session on non-compact CRs Accelerators: * >> >> o*SNR evolution * >> >> o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons * >> >> o*Leptonic PeVatrons * >> >> *For **"SNR evolution (young / old SNRs )"* >> >> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * >> >> ***For **"Unidentified / PeVatrons" >> * >> >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar Clusters* >> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * >> * >> * >> Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> * >> * >> *For "Leptonic PeVatrons" >> * >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary* >> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * >> >> Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> * >> * >> >> *c/ **Compact Objects* >> >> o*Pulsars* >> >> o*Microquasars * >> >> o*Jets M87* >> >> o*Jets monitoring / flares* >> >> *For "Pulsars"* >> >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706* >> >> Please add Emma in the loop, she can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> >> *For "Microquasars"* >> >> *- Topics under the Jets: SS433* >> >> Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> >> *For "Jets-M87"* >> >> *- Topics under the Jets: >> * >> >> Please add Garret in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> >> *For "Jets monitoring/flares"* >> >> *- Topics under the Jets: * >> >> Please add Garret in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> ** >> * >> * >> *d/ Pair-halo, EBL* >> >> *e/ GW Follow-up* >> >> >> Please add Fabian in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> * >> * >> *f/ Fast variability:* >> >> o*FRBs * >> >> o*Primordial Black Holes >> * >> >> >> **For "FRBs"** >> >> Please add Fabian in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> * >> * >> >> ***For "Primordial Black Holes"*** >> ** >> Please add Dieter in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * >> * >> * >> * >> ** >> ** >> >> oAnyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another contributed talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be discussed. Please discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as possible. >> >> The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the WG mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG coordinator to suggest any relevant topic. >> >> >> >> >> Am 27.02.20 um 15:54 schrieb Emma de Ona Wilhelmi: >> >> Dear all, >> >> I was drafting an email to the Stellar WG, but I realised that we >> need a lot of coordination between different groups, if we want to >> have the talks we proposed in the Agenda. I wonder then if it is >> better to write a common email that we can all draft together, to >> organise the contributions? >> >> I came out with the following email. Please feel free to modify >> and critisize, it is just a first draft and I didn’t even read it >> twice… >> >> Cheers >> e >> >> >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this >> week, where we discussed several issues, including the new >> publication policy and structure for the collaboration meeting. >> >> Regarding the first point, publication policy, the previous >> procedure has been modified to try to make the process of paper >> publishing more efficient. The new structure can be found >> here:*(LINK TO CONFLUENCE)* >> The basic steps are the following: >> >> New Idea -> Present it on the WG (and approved) -> Work/DATA & >> presentation of (semi)final results -> Draft and circulation among >> WG -> Paper Review by internal referees -> Collaboration Review -> >> Paper submission >> >> We also had a long discussion on how to make an efficient and >> engaging AP program during the collaboration meeting. We would >> like to somehow change a bit the previous structure with many >> contributions for (sometimes not very incremental) status report. >> Rather than that, we propose to ask the different Task/Project >> groups to collectively prepare a general talk and choose a speaker >> that would give a scientific context and a summary of the results. >> We understand it is also important to have detailed discussions on >> particular aspects of the analysis or project, therefore we also >> propose to use some of the Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get >> together and discuss some of these particular projects. >> >> As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following >> contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that >> *could* be included, if you would like to share the status of the >> project on the Col. Mtg.. We encourage you too to include also the >> MWL needs in each of the presentations. >> >> *1/ Session on Galactic Center / CR diffusion * >> >> * We envision 3 contributions including: * >> >> o*Astrophysics * >> >> o*Dark Matter * >> >> o*Diffuse * >> >> *Astrophysics * >> >> *- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..* >> >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Variability of the GC* >> >> *We would like to encourage people working on the Astrophysics >> aspects of the GC region to organise such talk. * >> >> *Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more >> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * >> >> *Dark Matter * >> * >> * >> *Diffuse * >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: LMC/SMC. * >> *- Topics under the CR propagation WG: * >> * >> * >> *Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more >> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * >> * >> * >> * >> * >> *2/ Session on CRs Accelerators: * >> >> o*SNR evolution * >> >> o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons * >> >> o*Leptonic PeVatrons * >> >> *SNR evolution: (young / old SNRs )* >> >> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * >> >> ***Unidentified / PeVatrons * >> >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar >> Clusters* >> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * >> * >> * >> *Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more >> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * >> * >> * >> *Leptonic PeVatrons * >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary* >> *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * >> *Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more >> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * >> >> >> *3/ **Compact Objects* >> >> o*Pulsars* >> >> o*Microquasars * >> >> o*Jets M87* >> >> o*Jets monitoring / flares* >> >> *Pulsars* >> >> *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706* >> >> *Microquasars* >> >> *- Topics under the Jets: SS433* >> * >> * >> *Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more >> detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * >> >> *Jets M87* >> >> *- Topics under the Jets: * >> >> *Jets monitoring/flares* >> >> *- Topics under the Jets: * >> * >> * >> * >> * >> *4/ Pair-halo EBL* >> >> *5/GW Follow-up* >> * >> * >> *6/ Fast variability:* >> >> o*FRBs * >> >> o*Fast variability related to DM – Primordial Black Holes (?)* >> >> *7/ DM Clumps (?)*** >> >> >> Anyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another >> contributed talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be >> discussed. Please discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as >> possible. >> >> >> >> The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the >> WG mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG >> coordinator to suggest any relevant topic. >> >> >> ** >> >> >> >> -- >> Hess-ap mailing list >> Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de <mailto:Hess-ap@lsw.uni-heidelberg.de> >> https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap >> -- >> Hess-ap mailing list >> Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de <mailto:Hess-ap@lsw.uni-heidelberg.de> >> https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap

Hi Anita- we are having a short call in the PBSM working group on Wednesday to finalize the program. We have already a table with the talks collected on the PBSM confluence page.  I hope it will be ok to have the final schedule ready by Wednesday afternoon,  best wishes, Dieter ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From: *"Anita Reimer" &lt;anita.reimer(a)uibk.ac.at&gt; *To: *"Emma de Ona Wilhelmi" &lt;wilhelmi(a)ice.csic.es&gt; *Cc: *"Hess-ap" &lt;hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de&gt; *Sent: *Friday, 28 February, 2020 17:03:19 *Subject: *Re: [Hess-ap] Agenda: Mail to the WGs Dear Emma, All,   first I'd like to thank you all for all your contributions to the (I think) a fruitful F2F-meeting with lively discussions that we had last Tuesday/Wednesday in Heidelberg. Thanks so much, Emma, for drafting this email below. While I think it is important to transport our envisioned structure for the AP program of the collaboration meeting to all WGs so that everybody sees the flow of topics, it might be difficult to coordinate it the way you propose as some of the WGs have (wisely) already started with collecting the talks that shall be presented at the collaboration meeting. However, I might be wrong. Please (all) comment. Nevertheless I have edited (below) a bit your draft email on the AP program at the upcoming collaboration meeting to all WGs. Please change where you find appropriate. Meanwhile I have created a confluence page for the preparation of the AP program at the collaboration meeting: https://hess-confluence.desy.de/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103… Please fill in the talks as soon as possible. More urgent is to get a time estimate for each topic, and for the total AP program (until Tuesday evening if possible), so that it can be communicated to the EC as soon as possible. All the best, Anita =============================================================================================== Dear colleagues, we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this week, where we discussed several issues, amongst others  on how to make an efficient and engaging AP program for the upcoming collaboration meeting. We would like to change a bit the previous structure which typically had many contributions for (sometimes not very incremental) status reports. Rather than that, we propose to ask the different Task/Project groups to collectively prepare a general talk and choose a speaker that would give a scientific context and a summary of the results. We encourage you too to include also the MWL needs in each of the presentations. We understand it is also important to have detailed discussions on particular aspects of the project or analysis, therefore we also propose to use some of the Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get together and discuss some of these particular projects. As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that *could* be included, if you would like to share the status of the project on the Col. Mtg.. *a/ Session on Galactic Center  / CR diffusion * *   We envision 3 contributions including: * o*Astrophysics * o*Dark Matter * o*Diffuse * *For****"Astrophysics" * *- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..* *- Topics under the Stellar WG:  Variability of the GC* We would like to encourage those working on the Astrophysics aspects of the GC region to organize such talk. Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. *For "Dark Matter" * * * Please add Dieter in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * *For "Diffuse" * *- Topics under the Stellar WG:  LMC/SMC. * *- Topics under the CR propagation WG: * * * Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. ** * * *b/ Session on non-compact CRs Accelerators: * o*SNR evolution * o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons * o*Leptonic PeVatrons * *For **"SNR evolution (young / old SNRs )"* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * ***For **"Unidentified / PeVatrons" * *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar Clusters* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * * * Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * * * *For "Leptonic PeVatrons" * *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * * * *c/ **Compact Objects* o*Pulsars* o*Microquasars * o*Jets M87* o*Jets monitoring / flares* *For "Pulsars"* *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706* Please add Emma in the loop, she can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * *For "Microquasars"* *- Topics under the Jets: SS433* Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * *For "Jets-M87"* *- Topics under the Jets: * Please add Garret in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * *For "Jets monitoring/flares"* *- Topics under the Jets: * Please add Garret in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * ** * * *d/ Pair-halo, EBL* *e/ GW Follow-up* Please add Fabian in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * * * *f/ Fast variability:* o*FRBs * o*Primordial Black Holes * **For "FRBs"** Please add Fabian in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * * * ***For "Primordial Black Holes"*** ** Please add Dieter in the loop, he can give you more detailed information on the expectation from this talk. * * * * ** ** oAnyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another contributed talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be discussed. Please discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as possible. The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the WG mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG coordinator to suggest any relevant topic. Am 27.02.20 um 15:54 schrieb Emma de Ona Wilhelmi: Dear all, I was drafting an email to the Stellar WG, but I realised that we need a lot of coordination between different groups, if we want to have the talks we proposed in the Agenda. I wonder then if it is better to write a common email that we can all draft together, to organise the contributions? I came out with the following email. Please feel free to modify and critisize, it is just a first draft and I didn’t even read it twice… Cheers e Dear colleagues, we had an efficient AP F2F meeting in Heidelberg beginning of this week, where we discussed several issues, including the new publication policy and structure for the collaboration meeting. Regarding the first point, publication policy, the previous procedure has been modified to try to make the process of paper publishing more efficient. The new structure can be found here:*(LINK TO CONFLUENCE)* The basic steps are the following: New Idea -> Present it on the WG (and approved) -> Work/DATA & presentation of (semi)final results -> Draft and circulation among WG -> Paper Review by internal referees -> Collaboration Review -> Paper submission We also had a long discussion on how to make an efficient and engaging AP program during the collaboration meeting. We would like to somehow change a bit the previous structure with many contributions for (sometimes not very incremental) status report. Rather than that, we propose to ask the different Task/Project groups to collectively prepare a general talk and choose a speaker that would give a scientific context and a summary of the results. We understand it is also important to have detailed discussions on particular aspects of the analysis or project, therefore we also propose to use some of the Free Time/Special Sessions slots to get together and discuss some of these particular projects. As preliminary agenda, we would like to have the following contributions. You can find for each WG, some of the topics that *could* be included, if you would like to share the status of the project on the Col. Mtg.. We encourage you too to include also the MWL needs in each of the presentations. *1/ Session on Galactic Center  / CR diffusion * *   We envision 3 contributions including: * o*Astrophysics * o*Dark Matter * o*Diffuse * *Astrophysics * *- Topics under the Diffuse WG: …..* *- Topics under the Stellar WG:  Variability of the GC* *We would like to encourage people working on the Astrophysics aspects of the GC region to organise such talk. * *Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * *Dark Matter * * * *Diffuse * *- Topics under the Stellar WG:  LMC/SMC. * *- Topics under the CR propagation WG: * * * *Please add Sabrina and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * * * * * *2/ Session on CRs Accelerators: * o*SNR evolution * o*Unidentified /CR PeVatrons * o*Leptonic PeVatrons * *SNR evolution: (young / old SNRs )* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * ***Unidentified / PeVatrons * *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Unidentified PeVatrons / Stellar Clusters* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * * * *Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * * * *Leptonic PeVatrons * *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Binary* *- Topics under the SNR/PWN WG: * *Please add Jacco and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * *3/ **Compact Objects* o*Pulsars* o*Microquasars * o*Jets M87* o*Jets monitoring / flares* *Pulsars* *- Topics under the Stellar WG: Vela / Crab / LIV/ J1706* *Microquasars* *- Topics under the Jets: SS433* * * *Please add Garret and Emma in the loop, we can give you more detailed instructions of what we expect from this talk. * *Jets M87* *- Topics under the Jets: * *Jets monitoring/flares* *- Topics under the Jets: * * * * * *4/ Pair-halo EBL* *5/GW Follow-up* * * *6/ Fast variability:* o*FRBs * o*Fast variability related to DM – Primordial Black Holes (?)* *7/ DM Clumps (?)*** Anyone in the WGs is of course welcome to suggest another contributed talk, if you think the topic is relevant and should be discussed. Please discuss it with your WG coordinator as soon as possible. The Free Time/Special session should be discussed in each of the WG mailing list. Likewise you are invited to contact your WG coordinator to suggest any relevant topic. ** -- Hess-ap mailing list Hess-ap(a)lsw.uni-heidelberg.de https://srv1n.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hess-ap